Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Mon Aug 10 18:35:51 EDT 2009
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 09:58 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >> * remove html? (we have xhtml)
> > On the other hand xhtml seems to be going out of fashion.
> Right, but I think xhtml has had a lot more attention over the years.
> Perhaps it should have the option to produce HTML - after all if you
> drop the XML header you're nearly there.
That sounds like a good idea. It would also make it a lot easier for
programs to switch between formats.
> Haddock has its own local copy of html. I wonder why that is...
Purge it and find out :-)
More information about the Libraries