Why isn’t (>>>) a method?
isaacdupree at charter.net
Wed Nov 26 15:25:37 EST 2008
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> I wonder why (>>>) is an ordinary function instead of a method with a default
> implementation based on (.). The latter would make life easier in two ways.
But if you don't add some "instance Category...where
(.)=...; id=...", then there are still problems! so
compatibility is still an issue.
and I have to say that your suggestion twists my mind a
little bit. after all, Category is the super-class now.
More information about the Libraries