Why isn’t (>>>) a method?
g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org
Wed Nov 26 09:38:24 EST 2008
I wonder why (>>>) is an ordinary function instead of a method with a default
implementation based on (.). The latter would make life easier in two ways.
First, it would be easier to write code which works with the old Arrow class
and the new Category/Arrow solution (fewer CPP stuff). Second, I often find
it easier to “think forwards” and use (>>>) instead of “thinking backwards”
and using (.). So it would be nicer for me to use (>>>) in a method
implementation instead of (.).
More information about the Libraries