haddock: record types with partially exported fields

Ian Lynagh igloo at earth.li
Wed Jun 11 07:07:20 EDT 2008

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:32:23AM +0200, David Waern wrote:
> 2008/6/5 Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk>:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 07:54:56PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
> >> 2008/5/28 Misha Aizatulin <avatar at hot.ee>:
> >> > P.S. What's the right place to talk about haddock by the way?
> >>
> >> haskelldoc at haskell.org
> >
> > Could we have Haddock as a component on the GHC trac?
> >
> > It seems approriate, with Haddock 2 so closely tied to GHC.
> I'd rather see Haddock less tied to GHC, and for it to have it's own
> trac. But let's see what happens with the GHC documentation problem.
> If Haddock has to be bundled with GHC, it makes more sense for it to
> be in the GHC trac.

If you do want haddock to have its own trac instance then you can now
create one on community, as described here:


More information about the Libraries mailing list