haddock: record types with partially exported fields
david.waern at gmail.com
Fri Jun 6 05:32:23 EDT 2008
2008/6/5 Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk>:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 07:54:56PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
>> 2008/5/28 Misha Aizatulin <avatar at hot.ee>:
>> > P.S. What's the right place to talk about haddock by the way?
>> haskelldoc at haskell.org
> Could we have Haddock as a component on the GHC trac?
> It seems approriate, with Haddock 2 so closely tied to GHC.
I'd rather see Haddock less tied to GHC, and for it to have it's own
trac. But let's see what happens with the GHC documentation problem.
If Haddock has to be bundled with GHC, it makes more sense for it to
be in the GHC trac.
More information about the Libraries