Proposal: System.Timeout module for base (Trac #980)
Simon Marlow
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 07:05:51 EST 2007
Bayley, Alistair wrote:
>> Bayley, Alistair writes:
>>
>> > In my experience, when run with -threaded, Network.Socket.accept
>> > does block, and async exceptions are not delivered (I'm using
>> > GHC-6.6 on Win XP).
>>
>> Oh. That's bad news. I don't think the socket configuration has
>> anything to do with it, this seems to be an RTS decision. The truth
>> is, however, I really don't know. Can someone else shed some light on
>> this matter?
>>
>> Peter
>
> Well, I have a fairly simple test case, if anyone wants to see it.
This is a Windows-specific bug. In fact all I/O on Windows in the threaded RTS
is currently done with blocking foreign calls, so you won't be able to kill any
threads blocked on I/O I'm afraid. In the non-threaded RTS you can kill the
Haskell thread, but the I/O will still happen (actually I think this is worse
than the -threaded behaviour).
We'd like to do all I/O using an I/O manager thread, as we do on Unix. If there
are any Windows experts listening, this is a 1-2 day task that would have great
benefit to Windows users.
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Libraries
mailing list