portability of Data.ByteString.Lazy
Malcolm Wallace
Malcolm.Wallace at cs.york.ac.uk
Thu Nov 2 06:50:09 EST 2006
Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk> wrote:
> Data.ByteString.Lazy defines ByteString as a type synonym, and then
> uses that in instances, which isn't permitted by Haskell 98. How
> about defining a newtype ByteString in Data.ByteString.Lazy.Base
> instead?
Here is another portability problem in Data.ByteString.Lazy:
Constructor :*: used at 590:22-590:24 is not defined.
Regards,
Malcolm
More information about the Libraries
mailing list