System.Posix.* not haddocked

Isaac Jones ijones at
Wed Nov 9 20:19:58 EST 2005

"Simon Marlow" <simonmar at> writes:

> On 08 November 2005 08:17, Isaac Jones wrote:
>> Björn Bringert <bringert at> writes:
>>> Is there some special reason why the System.Posix.* modules are not
>>> haddocked? There seems to be documentation available in the hslibs
>>> docs [1]. Is it just that noone has bothered to do the copy-and-paste
>>> yet? If this is the case, I might try to find time to do some of it
>>> myself.
>> I did the haddock-ization, but then couldn't get the whole fptools
>> tree to build for a while and gave up; maybe I should have just
>> checked it in and let someone with a working tree fix it.  Here's the
>> link to the archives.  Might be a good starting point:
> Do you have more patches or just that one?  I'll be happy to
> test/fix/checkin anything you have.

Just that one, I'm afraid.



More information about the Libraries mailing list