Difference Argument Order
Simon Marlow
simonmar at microsoft.com
Mon May 23 05:21:02 EDT 2005
On 23 May 2005 01:43, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> Which of these argument orders is more intuitive to you?
>
> 1. This one makes more sense when considering the function formed by
> applying one argument:
>
> add :: Diff -> Absolute -> Absolute
> add d a = a + d
> subtract :: Diff -> Absolute -> Absolute
> subtract d a = a - d
> diff :: Absolute -> Absolute -> Diff
> diff a b = b - a
>
> So "add x", "subtract y" and perhaps "diff z" are intuitively useful
> functions. And we also have "subtract = add . negate".
>
> 2. This one is more familiar for the English language and for the
> standard operators:
>
> add :: Absolute -> Diff -> Absolute
> add a d = a + d
> subtract :: Absolute -> Diff -> Absolute
> subtract a d = a - d
> diff :: Absolute -> Absolute -> Diff
> diff a b = a - b
If you have the second form, then it would make sense to call them
"plus", and "minus", because they correspond to the infix operators.
BTW, the Prelude already has "subtract" with the opposite argument order
to infix "-", but this was provided mainly because (-1) means (negate 1)
rather than ((-) 1).
For the "diff" functions, the first form seems more natural to me,
because the arguments increase left-to-right, ie. in (diff T1 T2) T2 is
later than T1.
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Libraries
mailing list