GK at ninebynine.org
Tue Jan 25 11:16:10 EST 2005
At 08:56 25/01/05 +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
>I think we all agree on having Time as an Integer or similar
>representing time with some particular resolution. The question seems
>to be how to deal with CalendarTime, defined as a record with fields
>for the various components found in a human-type time stamp.
Just for the record, my silence is not consent on this.
I believe I'm in a minority and don't challenge the majority decision, but
I would prefer a date/time representation based on a pair (days,ticks),
where ticks is a count of some suitable fraction of a second. My reasons
have been recorded here previously ... I'll dig out a reference if anyone
More information about the Libraries