required fields in Cabal
simonmar at microsoft.com
Tue Feb 22 04:42:52 EST 2005
On 22 February 2005 01:56, Isaac Jones wrote:
> BTW, Should we regularize the names of the fields at this late date?
> Sorry for not doing this earlier. We have libBuildInfo for libraries,
> but buildInfo for executables. We also have exeName. Does anything
> outside of cabal depend on these names (yet)?
VS is using them, I recently updated our VS code to match the current
I'm not too worried about the names of fields right now, since I think
things will have to change in the future anyway when we sort out the
relationship between libraries & executables.
Change buildInfo to exeBuildInfo if you like, and maybe modulePath to
More information about the Libraries