ketil.malde at bccs.uib.no
Thu Dec 15 03:21:32 EST 2005
Isaac Jones <ijones at syntaxpolice.org> writes:
> I propose that each haskell compiler / interpreter come with
> runhaskell. It should check to see whether runhaskell exists already
> and if so, leave it alone. If not, provide it.
Shouldn't replacement be the default? I think a typical user will
stick with one Haskell implementation, and just upgrade it once in a
while - in which case replacement is probably what is desired.
Anyway, I expect most users to install via OS packages (rpm,deb,..),
and distributions tend to have their own solutions for this kind of
thing (/etc/alternatives springs to mind).
> That should probably be tweakable with the configure script.
'runhaskell' could perhaps also be a small script that checks for the
availability of 'runhugs', 'runghc', etc. This way, it could be the
same for all Haskell implementations, and the choice could be
configurable on a user basis (rather than per system). It would cost
a bit of startup time, though.
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Libraries