nhn at Cs.Nott.AC.UK
Wed Oct 20 11:50:03 EDT 2004
Sven Panne wrote:
> Henrik Nilsson wrote:
>> [...] (Unless everyone
>> uses "cpphs", then, which ultimately would seem like a good idea.)
> If you mean "everyone happy with a LGPL", then I would agree. But GHC and
> Hugs use a BSD-style license, so cpphs is not an option for them. After
> some googling and testing I found MCPP
> which is a highly configurable preprocessor with a small footprint and a
> BSD license. Shipping this as an internal tool with GHC 6.4 and the next
> Hugs release (especially for use with the hugs-package tool) should be
> possible, I see what I can do...
My point was more a plea for a CPP-like preprocessor that understands
Haskell's lexical syntax, which, as far as I know, is what "cpphs" is
about, than an argument for any particular preprocessor.
I had a look at the MCPP documentation, and while configurable, it
still seems totally C-centric. So I'd guess you are talking about
creating a modified version of MCPP tuned to Haskell?
Could an alternative possibly be to resolve the licence issue instead?
School of Computer Science and Information Technology
The University of Nottingham
nhn at cs.nott.ac.uk
This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any
attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are
advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
More information about the Libraries