simonmar at microsoft.com
Mon May 17 14:37:28 EDT 2004
On 14 May 2004 18:17, Christian Maeder wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>>> "FiniteMap Int a" performs better than "Map Int a", but not as good
>>> as "IntMap a", but the differences are unimportant for us.
>> How much better? I'm not keen to import something that's going to
>> degrade performance of existing code noticeably.
> Ok, I'll send you numbers (later). Are you going to reimplement
> FiniteMap via DData.Map (or how could existing code suffer)?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I mean that programmers who migrate
code to Data.Map will see a performance loss; that's something I'd like
to avoid. Furthermore, there shouldn't be any need for Map to be slower
A 10% loss in performance for FiniteMap isn't going to show up in many
profiles, but it'll cause a performance degradation in *lots* of
applications, so fixing it is worthwhile. Indeed, we should take the
opportunity to see if the code can be tuned any further and improve on
the performance of FiniteMap.
More information about the Libraries