wolfgang at jeltsch.net
Mon Mar 15 12:42:21 EST 2004
Am Sonntag, 14. März 2004 18:31 schrieben Sie:
> > And why does Seq.concat have the type
> > Seq (Seq a) -> Seq a
> > instead of
> > [Seq a] -> Seq a
> > which would be more consistent with the other modules?
> I gave it some thought, and concluded that it is more
> important for Seq to be consitent with itself than with
> other modules. This really should be solved with type
> classes, yet we chose not to introduce new classes with
> Moreover, Seq is an instance of Monoid, so 'mconcat'
> can be used.
But why does LambdaSeq.concat have the type
[LambdaSeq a] -> LambdaSeq a
LambdaSeq (LambdaSeq a) -> LambdaSeq a
More information about the Libraries