Soliciting comments on Edison
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 11:04:23 +0100
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:25:10PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
> > I'm not sure that the separate top-level name is justified.
> I'm not so sure about that either, but the hierarchy document had one
> last time I looked.
At the moment, Edison has its own top-level name in the hierarchy. This
was intended to be a temporary measure - ultimately we want a
comprehensive library of data structures under Data, but there was a
feeling at the time that Edison is not The Right Thing.
For my money, I'd be happy with something simpler.