Library hierarchy, contd.

[Dylan Thurston]

On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:44:40PM -0600, Alastair David Reid wrote:
> 
> Simon Marlow <simonmar@microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> > The only reason that Edison is in a subtree of its own is [...]
> 
> Maybe the right thing to do here and in the case of LUD decomposition,
> FFT, and other things that Dylan mentioned is to keep these libraries
> in the User or Org hierarchies for a while longer. ...

For the record, you're probably referring to a message of Jan Skibinski.

Best,
	Dylan Thurston