[jhc] JHC benchmark.

[Lemmih]

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:22 PM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 04:08:33PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Lemmih<lemmih at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
>> >>> > Hmm.. looks like many are failing due to the unpacked poly bug, as shown
>> >>> > by regression test 'tests.bugs.UnpackedPoly'. Combined with the newtype
>> >>> > unpacking bug pointed out by droundy earlier, I think it is time for me
>> >>> > to take a look at unpacked fields.
>> >>>
>> >>> x2n1 is quite interesting. It generated the wrong answer with the GC
>> >>> enabled but works fine without it.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I think I am pushing the boehm GC further than it was designed for
>> >> at times :)
>> >>
>> >> My recent patches sent to the list fix a few bugs that were keeping some
>> >> of the benchmarks from compiling.
>> >
>> > I'm re-running the benchmark now.
>>
>> 18/73 with jhc-0.7.2-17.
>
> Hi, I have been going through the failing cases, the newest patches
> published should fix several more of the tests, (and hopefully speed up
> others).
>
> My hope is that the work Taral is doing at hunting down the space leaks
> will allow compilation of ByteString which should help out a signifigant
> number of the currently broken due to missing bytestring ones as well.

23/73 with jhc 0.7.2-26. I'll take out the nogc version. I feel it
distorts the data.

-- 
Cheers,
  Lemmih