Problem with hierarchical libraries in Hugs compared to ghc/nhc98

[Olaf Chitil]

Ross Paterson wrote:

> I've had a look, and it's not so hard to do what I suggested, but the
> changes would be cleaner if the search strategy for module names, currently
> [...]
> i.e. swap the first two generators.  
> [...]
> Any views?

Looks fine to me.

Note that in my opinion the extra directory should only be added, if the
import or load really contained a path with slashes, not if it is a pure
hierarchical module name.

I suppose it is sensible for Hugs to accept names such as A/B/C.D.E but
it currently also accepts names such as A.B.C/D/E, which I think it
should not.

Olaf

-- 
OLAF CHITIL, 
 Dept. of Computer Science, The University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. 
 URL: http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~olaf/
 Tel: +44 1904 434756; Fax: +44 1904 432767