[Haskell] Re: Top Level

Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org
Mon Jun 22 08:39:52 EDT 2009

Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 21:35 schrieb Ian Lynagh:
> > > So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc,
> > > or even just Reactive.Yampa etc.
> >
> > Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then?
> > Under Control.Reactive.Reactive?
> I don't know anything about the package, but if putting the modules
> directly under Control.Reactive wouldn't make sense then it sounds to me
> like the package name is poor (too generic).

reactive is a specific FRP implementation by Conal Elliott. So it shouldn’t be 
put directly under Control.Reactive since other reasonable FRP 
implementations exist.

Best wishes,

More information about the Haskell mailing list