[Haskell] Re: Top Level

Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org
Thu Jun 18 12:03:03 EDT 2009

Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 11:05 schrieb Malcolm Wallace:
> The problem with a top-level namespace like FRP is that it is a cryptic
> acronym: it means nothing to a novice, and may be easily confused with
> other acronyms by an expert.  I believe top-level names should _at_the_
> _very_least_ be minimally descriptive of the category of things that
> live in it.
> So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc,
> or even just Reactive.Yampa etc.

Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? Under 

Best wishes,

More information about the Haskell mailing list