[Haskell] Re: Getting a function dependency graph from source
Durward McDonell
durward.mcdonell at jhuapl.edu
Thu Oct 12 11:10:01 EDT 2006
Yes, this is exactly what I wanted! Thanks, and thanks for writing
it all in the first place. :-)
However, I haven't quite been able to get it to work fully. I did
get it installed and running, after I took the advice about using
the latest versions and just installing the binaries. I even got
pfe to add all my files and all the relevant ghc-6.4.2 libraries
and Prelude. However, "pfe chase" only worked on my files, and
not on, say, /usr/local/src/ghc-6.4.2/libraries/base/parsec. I
had to add all the ghc files one at a time. Also, now that pfe
is satisfied that it needs no more modules, if I run "pfe deps",
for example, it complains that I have many undefined export
entries. All of the functions listed are Prelude functions.
I have the "prelude" option set to True. It seems like I'm very
close. What am I doing wrong?
Here's the output of "pfe options", fwiw:
Flags {prel = True, plogic = True, cpp = Just "/lib/cpp -traditional -P
-D__HASKELL98__ -D__PFE__
-I/usr/local/src/ghc-6.4.2/libraries/base/include"}
Thanks again.
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 16:32 -0700, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pfe command line tool from the Programatica Project has functionality that
> seems to fit fairly well with what you are asking for:
>
> pfe deps -- lists function level dependencies
> pfe needed -- lists everything needed by a definition
> pfe dead -- lists unused definitions
> pfe slice -- extract a slice by eliminating unused defintions
>
>
> For more information, and downloads, see
>
> http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~hallgren/Programatica/download/
>
> Thomas H
>
>
> Durward McDonell wrote:
> > Hello. This seems like a basic question, but I haven't
> > been able to find an answer. I have a pile of Haskell
> > code that is compiled into a library, and a Haskell program
> > that uses this library. What I would like is something
> > that will look at my program and follow the function calls
> > until it gets to the Prelude. I want to know which functions
> > in the library and in the Prelude actually get used (at
> > least potentially).
> >
--
Durward McDonell
durward.mcdonell at jhuapl.edu
More information about the Haskell
mailing list