Wish list: expanded defaulting, dependent types, reflection

[Ashley Yakeley]

At 2001-09-29 09:11, Mike Gunter wrote:

>There does not seem to be a way to do everything I'd like in GHC even
>in its most permissive mode (I'm using "-fallow-overlapping-instances
>-fallow-undecidable-instances".)  In particular, I'd like to use bare
>integer literals together with values of the types I define.

Do you have a code example of what you're trying to do?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA