LAST CALL to comment on the Applicative/Monad Proposal

[Philippa Cowderoy]

On 18/12/2018 07:38, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> Hello Mario et al.,
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM Mario Blažević <blamario at ciktel.net> wrote:
>> While you're reviewing AMP, please take a bit of time to also comment on
>> the related new MonadPlus excise proposal at
>> https://github.com/haskell/rfcs/pull/23
>>
>> The proposal is very short so it should be an easy decision. Thank you.
> As I've explained already on the RFC, I refuse (i.e. to make this very
> clear: I'm exercising my veto) to accept the AMP change without also
> at least a commitment to MFP and MRP. And note that the committee was
> created with the explicit request from SPJ that it ought to be a
> consensus-based decision process rather than a democratic voting
> process -- and there isn't consensus in this matter as far as I'm
> concerned.


To be clear: you would prefer the Report's status quo to AMP without MFP 
and MRP? Because that looks likely to be where we're headed unless we 
wait out GHC implementing both and see if everyone is resigned to that 
result.