Named arguments to functions?

Iavor Diatchki iavor.diatchki at gmail.com
Thu Nov 10 21:59:44 UTC 2016


Hello,

I would say that this is a too complex of a change to discuss for Haskell
Prime without implementation or prior experience.    If you are interested
in something like this, you may want to start a discussion of the design on
one of the other lists, or perhaps write up a proposal for GHC.

The proposals currently under discussion are on the `github` URL.

Cheers,
-Iavor





On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was going through https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Process#Proposals and
> noticed the following:
>
> > Ideally the language change should be implemented already, so that
> experience gained with the implementation can inform the discussion
>
> Is this a hard requirement? I would like to see the ability to pass named
> arguments to functions somehow (most probably through anonymous records).
> I'm unaware of any existing language extension that solves this problem.
> Does this render the discussion out-of-bounds from a Haskell Prime
> perspective? Has this already been proposed and considered?
>
> Also, going by what is given on the Wiki, I'm confused about where to
> check the current status of proposals that are being considered. Which is
> the primary link:
>
> * https://prime.haskell.org/query?status=new&status=
> assigned&status=reopened&group=state
> * Or, https://github.com/haskell/rfcs
>
> -- Saurabh.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20161110/d840e63b/attachment.html>


More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list