Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

[Tony Morris]

"Broken" here is hyperbole for "can be significantly improved for very
little penalty."


On 05/10/15 23:16, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen <alexander at plaimi.net
> <mailto:alexander at plaimi.net>> wrote:
> 
>     On 05/10/15 11:59, Simon Thompson wrote:
>     > There’s an old fashioned maxim that sums this up in a pithy way:
>     > “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.
>     But... it *is* broken.
> 
> 
> Somehow, we managed to use Monad before this. That does not sound "broken".
> 
> -- 
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com <mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>                        
>          ballbery at sinenomine.net <mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>