Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`
Alexander Berntsen
alexander at plaimi.net
Mon Oct 5 13:20:51 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 05/10/15 15:16, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> But... it *is* broken.
> Somehow, we managed to use Monad before this. That does not sound
> "broken".
Just because something is broken does not mean that it is not possible
to use it. We use broken things and are subject to broken systems all
day every day.
You may of course argue that it is fine for it to be broken.
- --
Alexander
alexander at plaimi.net
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=h9OY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Haskell-prime
mailing list