MPTCs and functional dependencies

John Meacham john at
Thu Feb 2 18:06:24 EST 2006

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:09:35PM +0000, Henrik Nilsson wrote:
> Now, I'm not saying that FDs are that important, only that it seems
> to me they are. I'd be happy to be convinced of the opposite.
> But from the above, it at least seems that John M. too actually
> says that FDs are important?

Oh, I don't think anyone is disagreeing that they are important. they
are just quite underspecified at the moment, and it looks like they will
be replaced at some point anyway. It would be great if we can figure out
some well specified subset that works for most uses that is ready to put
into haskell prime.


John Meacham - ⑆⑆john⑈ 

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list