[Haskell-cafe] Haskell CI with many repositories/packages

Jeroen Bransen jeroen at chordify.net
Fri Oct 27 09:44:58 UTC 2017

That is similar to what I am doing now, but I don't think this solves my 
problem. When I have a package A depending on B, I make a mistake in B 
such that it doesn't compile, then commit something correct to A, the 
build for A will also fail because of this error in B. I would like to 
let A be based on the last succesful build of B, but with shared 
`.stack-work` I don't think that's going to work.

Jeroen Bransen

Op 24-10-2017 om 16:39 schreef Adam Bergmark:
> I haven't felt the need to share build artifacts like this. Instead, 
> e.g., if you cache your `.stack-work` and your master project does a 
> git clone of sub projects and you put those paths in your stack.yaml 
> then `stack build` should only rebuild the changes. You may be able to 
> share parts of `.stack-work` as well but I haven't looked into that.
> HTH,
> Adam
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 at 11:35 Jeroen Bransen <jeroen at chordify.net 
> <mailto:jeroen at chordify.net>> wrote:
>     Hi cafe,
>     Does anyone know of a good setup for doing continuous integration
>     with a
>     set of Haskell packages, each in its own repository? Just building
>     everything upon every commit is not so hard, but to speed up building
>     times I'd like to build and test only the minimal set of packages. In
>     particular, at a commit for some package A, I would like to build and
>     test A and all packages that depend on A.
>     The problem is that most CI tools use some notion of 'build artefact',
>     which Stack doesn't really seem to give me. Ideally building a package
>     results in some object file, which can then be used by the other
>     packages. When building failed, packages that depend on it can
>     still use
>     the last succesful build. I've tried to look up some Haskell projects,
>     but most of them seem to use some ad hoc setup.
>     Some pointers are appreciated, as we are using Gitlab a gitlab-runner
>     specific option would be great, but I am also open to use Jenkins or
>     other tools. And I guess my main struggle now is on the
>     stack/Haskell side.
>     Regards,
>     Jeroen Bransen
>     _______________________________________________
>     Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>     To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
>     http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>     Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20171027/8be34f4d/attachment.html>

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list