[Haskell-cafe] is 'stack ghci' really experimental?

[Adam Bergmark]

I'm sure stack ghci still has some quirks, but i've used it since the
initial release without major problems.

I'd recommend looking at intero mode for stack+emacs integration.

On Wed, 31 May 2017 at 09:36, Dennis Raddle <dennis.raddle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh, I also wanted to ask about Haskell mode of Emacs and ghci. I have not
> tried to run ghci from within Emacs, but I can imagine doing so would
> provide an advantage. Does haskelll-mode parse line numbers in error
> messages and jump to them?
>
> And is it possible to run 'stack ghci' from within haskell-mode?
>
> Thanks
> D
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Dennis Raddle <dennis.raddle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I noticed that the stack docs say 'stack ghci' is experimental. I assume
>> it's a common need (certainly is for me) to interpret my code while
>> developing. Is it safe to use 'stack ghci' or is there another way that is
>> more robust?
>> D
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20170531/d9b81649/attachment.html>