[Haskell-cafe] Crossreferenced codebase for Stackage LTS 9.2 available

[Robin Palotai]

I used fpco/stack-build:lts-9.2. Might explain, thank you!
Is the GHC directory layout the same in snoyberg/stackage? Just asking
since the derived container hijacks the GHC executable for the indexer.

2017-08-31 14:18 GMT+02:00 Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>:

> Which Docker image did you use for building? The (inappropriately named
> but hysterical raisins and all that) snoyberg/stackage Docker images are
> what we use for doing the actual Stackage builds.
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017, 2:37 PM Robin Palotai <palotai.robin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Niklas - sounds like a nice usecase.
>>
>> Though we need to make sure no usages are missing to make that decision
>> (there are some edge cases yet, for example around TH splice application,
>> or type families). Also it's only valid on the set of indexed packages.
>>
>> I'll merge later, but https://github.com/robinp/haskell-indexer/commit/
>> 0592c3d934515c4661c69c5b998e26a543b93b52 has the changes necessary. Note:
>> - It didn't index ~50 packages
>> - For some it complained that C libs are missing (like SDL, though I was
>> using the full stack-build Docker image)
>> - I had to kill a few huge compilations that ate my RAM (Agda,
>> language-python, and some yi packages)
>>
>> I would estimate 8-12 hours, but didn't follow closely (also it was
>> idling quite some due to the huge compilations).
>>
>> By the way the per-package entries are available for download in a
>> tarball, so if you just index your local packages and dump the entries
>> along with those of your dependencies into the graphstore, you can get a
>> ~full local index without reexecuting the whole indexing. In the future it
>> would be nice to have tooling that magically fetches the pre-generated
>> entries you need, and merges them locally.
>>
>> 2017-08-31 13:23 GMT+02:00 Niklas Hambüchen <mail at nh2.me>:
>>
>>> Hey Robin,
>>>
>>> This is really awesome and useful.
>>>
>>> I think it will help a lot to decide whether or not we can
>>> change/deprecate a certain function, as now we can really easily judge
>>> how many callers it has.
>>>
>>> How long does that take to generate?
>>> And how did you run it to do it for all of Stackage?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On 31/08/17 06:41, Robin Palotai wrote:
>>> > To find out who else uses your favorite functions and
>>> > how: http://stuff.codereview.me/lts/9.2 .
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20170831/1042e91b/attachment.html>