[Haskell-cafe] Why is the no tuple syntax for sum types
Phil Ruffwind
rf at rufflewind.com
Fri Jul 31 22:44:29 UTC 2015
For sum types you need a way to construct them and pattern match them.
Without a way to _name_ them, it would probably look like this:
showError :: (Result | Error3 | Error8) -> String
showError (result ||) = "no error"
showError (| error3 |) = "error3: " ++ show error3
showError (|| error8 |) = "error8: " ++ show error8
It's not the most readable code, so I'd generally avoid using it for
anything greater than 3 (same applies to tuples).
It also suffers the same flaw as tuples: no way to extend them easily.
Imagine adding a new error: you have to edit _all_ of the patterns:
showError :: (Result | Error3 | Error8 | Error11 ) -> String
showError (result |||) = "no error"
showError (| error3 ||) = "error3: " ++ show error3
showError (|| error8 |) = "error8: " ++ show error8
showError (||| error11 ) = "error11: " ++ show error11
Extensible records and variants might be able to solve these problems,
but that's a rabbit-hole of its own though.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list