[Haskell-cafe] Hackage inconsistent? (pandoc.cabal in 1.13.1)

Peter Simons simons at cryp.to
Fri Oct 31 09:56:39 UTC 2014


Hi Lennart,

 > Bumping [the (n+1)th digit] is not safe, as the maintainer might
 > decide to publish a new version that adds a new component.)

Suppose I publish foo-1.0. Then a sequence of edits would produce
versions 1.0.1, 1.0.1.1, 1.0.1.1.1, and so on.

Why would there be any problem?

Best regards,
Peter



More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list