[Haskell-cafe] Best Actor system?

[Carter Schonwald]

the various "actor" libs are all different, and they make different trade
offs, theres no "this is best" (yet).

I'm personally unsatisfied with the solutions i've seen in haskell and
other languages personally, so i'm sorely tempted to yak have my own and
thus contribute to the confusion even more :)


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:40 PM, james <james at mansionfamily.plus.com> wrote:

>  On 27/03/2014 17:28, Christopher Allen wrote:
>
>  I don't actually want to get drawn into this, but one point would be
> that it's really just the same fallacies as OOP in general, but concurrent.
>
>
> Well, horses for courses, I've been writing distributed C++ apps since
> cfront was shiny and new.
>
> I find writing off OOP as distasteful as writing off functional, and there
> are people in both camps.
>
> I have ordered Simon's book and will take care to read it.
>
> In the mean time - does anyone have an answer to the question I asked?
>
> James
>
>
>  The idea that isolation behind an interface (message passing or not) is
> going to prevent unnecessary mutation or side effects from getting out of
> control.
>
>  In practice, it doesn't do that at all and the fact that you're making
> your inter-dependencies more implicit, rather than explicit, through the
> use of isolated buckets of side-effecting state and mutation is going to
> make it harder rather than easier to debug the program when it invariably
> breaks. I'd rather get a call-stack if I'm going to abandon Haskell-y
> goodness. And your Actors *will* get into a bad state, so you'll end up
> writing Inspector and Debugger mixins just to keep a handle on the
> complexity when they get into that bad state.
>
>  It's not impossible for Actors to make sense. I used agents (which are
> not full-blown Actors per se) in Clojure for side-effect isolation,
> serialization, and thread safety to good effect, but I kept how much "work"
> they did to a bare minimum and tried to keep everything in pure functions
> as long as I could.
>
>  It's just that I see programmers with a shiny new hammer looking for
> every nail they can find.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Zongheng Yang <zongheng.y at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Can anyone give some detailed cons of Akka / actor model?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Alois Cochard <alois.cochard at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I have good experience with actors (Scala/Akka), and I can tell you
>> that you
>> > should avoid them as much as possible.
>> > I think the model is good if you need to do some low level concurrency
>> > coding on a language that don't have effect tracking in types.
>> >
>> > Having used the Async library from Marlow, I highly recommend it... and
>> it
>> > probably cover a big percentage of traditional concurrency use cases.
>> >
>> > You still have Haskell Cloud if you want distributed messaging.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 27 March 2014 06:29, james <james at mansionfamily.plus.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Having been introduced to actors by looking at Erlang, I discovered
>> Akka.
>> >>
>> >> It seems that the performance is pretty impressive and I like the
>> model.
>> >>
>> >> There seem to be several basic Actor libraries in Hackage, but they
>> don't
>> >> seem
>> >> to be very actively developed.
>> >>
>> >> I'm more interested in the model for programming within a single
>> runtime
>> >> than I am for distributed systems, but message and dispatch performance
>> >> definitely is important.
>> >>
>> >> Can anyone share experiences with the different packages?  Is any one
>> >> of them stand-out?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> James
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> >> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alois Cochard
>> > http://aloiscochard.blogspot.com
>> > http://twitter.com/aloiscochard
>> > http://github.com/aloiscochard
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20140327/f69fbf34/attachment.html>