[Haskell-cafe] Haddock Constructor parameter documentation without record syntax

[Mateusz Kowalczyk]

On 22/01/14 10:29, satvik chauhan wrote:
> Using the record is an option but it pollutes the namespace which I don't
> want to do.
> 
> Any ideas why this is not possible?
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk
> <fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk>wrote:
> 
>> On 22/01/14 09:48, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>>> On 22/01/14 10:42, satvik chauhan wrote:
>>>> data Foo = Foo Int -- ^ First
>>>>                           Int -- ^ Second
>>> I don't think you can do it that way. See [0].
>>>
>>> [0]  <http://www.haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/ch03s02.html#idp1371328252
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>>> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>>
>>
>> I can confirm that you can not document constructors in this way. If you
>> really need to, you can make it into a record and document each field.
>>
>> --
>> Mateusz K.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
>> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>>
> 
> 
> 

See http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/95

-- 
Mateusz K.