[Haskell-cafe] Haddock Constructor parameter documentation without record syntax

[satvik chauhan]

Using the record is an option but it pollutes the namespace which I don't
want to do.

Any ideas why this is not possible?


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk
<fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk>wrote:

> On 22/01/14 09:48, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> > On 22/01/14 10:42, satvik chauhan wrote:
> >> data Foo = Foo Int -- ^ First
> >>                           Int -- ^ Second
> > I don't think you can do it that way. See [0].
> >
> > [0]  <http://www.haskell.org/haddock/doc/html/ch03s02.html#idp1371328252
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> > Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> >
>
> I can confirm that you can not document constructors in this way. If you
> really need to, you can make it into a record and document each field.
>
> --
> Mateusz K.
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>



-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Satvik Chauhan
Fourth Year Under Graduate Student
Deptt. of Computer Science and Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Kanpur-208016, INDIA
Email: mystic.satvik at gmail.com , satvikc at iitk.ac.in

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20140122/0ae8f89c/attachment.html>