[Haskell-cafe] (no subject)
fvillanustre at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 14:22:37 CEST 2013
while I don't disagree regarding the clean and consistent syntax of
Haskell, do you realize that some people would argue that camels are horses
designed by committee too? :)
While designing by committee guarantees agreement across a large number of
people, it does not always ensure efficiency, as committees may lead to
poor compromises, sometimes.
However, Haskell may be an example of a good case of design-by-committee
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Zed Becker <zed.becker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Haskell, is arguably the best example of a design-by-committee language.
> The syntax is clean and most importantly, consistent. The essence of a
> purely functional programming is maintained, without disturbing its real
> world capacity.
> To all the people who revise the Haskell standard, and implement the
> Promise to me, and the rest of the community, that you will keep
> up the good effort :)
> Promise to me, and the rest of the community, that Haskell will
> always spiritually remain the same clean, consistent programming language
> as it is now!
> Zed Becker
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe