[Haskell-cafe] On the purity of Haskell
jerzy.karczmarczuk at unicaen.fr
Mon Jan 2 11:03:23 CET 2012
Conal Elliott cites Steve Horne:
> I look at this World parameter as purely hypothetical, a trick
> used to gain an intuition. Whereas Jerzy (I think) uses it to
> claim Haskell is referentially transparent - those differing x and
> y values come from different worlds, or different world-states.
> I don't see this interpretation in Jerzy's words, and I'd be very
> surprised if he had that sort of argument in mind.
I don't think either having used the 'World' model as an argument of the
The main reason is that I don't know what does it mean, the referential
transparency of the real world.
There is a philosophical issue involved: the problem of IDENTITY, which
is as old as the humanity, and it will survive it... We simply don't
know what does it mean: "the same"...
But I disagree quite strongly with the idea of "/World parameter as
purely hypothetical, a trick used to gain an intuition/". I mentioned
the language Clean (no reaction, seems that Haskellians continue to
In Clean this IS the IO model. You have such entities as FileSystem,
which has the Unique Access property, etc. You can put all that in an
equivalent of the IO Monad, constructed within Clean itself, not as a
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe