[Haskell-cafe] Mersenne-random and standard random API
alexey.skladnoy at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 18:11:17 CET 2012
On 09.02.2012 18:27, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> Actually it is not true that the state has to be copied. Using the
> lazy ST monad we can implement this interface and internally use
> mutable ST arrays.
> See for example
> It ends up with this function that generates the infinite lazy
> sequence of words from a seed word. This can be then made to fit the
> next :: g -> (Int, g) interface, with g = [W].
This is very elegant trick! Ability to snapshot and restore generator
> So yes this looses a small constant factor because of the extra lazy
> list (which could be reduced somewhat), so it's not suitable for the
> absolutely max performance interface, but it certainly allows the use
> of traditional mutable PRNGs with the nice interface with decent
> Certainly none of these PRNGs support split, but that's a separate
> issue. Overall, I think the Random type class is salvageable given a
> few changes. In the end, the Random module probably needs both an
> ST-monadic interface and a pure one. People can use the ST one if it
> happens to be more convenient or if they need to squeeze the last drop
> of performance out.
There is another problem. Functions like `next' aren't meant to be used
by humans. One have to thread state manually and this is tedious
and error-prone. So PRNG should be wrapped into monad. Are `next'-like
function needed at all?
I'd expect that creation of generic and useful type class would be
More information about the Haskell-Cafe