[Haskell-cafe] Some thoughts on Type-Directed Name Resolution
qdunkan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 9 01:26:11 CET 2012
> How about § then? Surely at this late date we can allow ourselves *one* non-ASCII character?
> The very name of it (*section* sign) suggests taking a part; and if you are totally in love
> with dot, think of it as a dot with ponytails.
I suggest record的field, or record之field for the more classically
minded. And why not some synonyms like recordのfield and
recordकाfield, to be inclusive.
Once these floodgates are opened we'll never want for operator names again :)
More information about the Haskell-Cafe