[Haskell-cafe] Some thoughts on Type-Directed Name Resolution

[Evan Laforge]

> How about § then?  Surely at this late date we can allow ourselves *one* non-ASCII character?
> The very name of it (*section* sign) suggests taking a part; and if you are totally in love
> with dot, think of it as a dot with ponytails.

I suggest record的field, or record之field for the more classically
minded.  And why not some synonyms like recordのfield and
recordकाfield, to be inclusive.

Once these floodgates are opened we'll never want for operator names again :)