No subject

, so a list of simple examples with increasing difficulty or a cookbook-sty=
le tutorial work very well. In comparison, learning from general descriptio=
ns is much harder and usually done by learning from examples anyway.<br>


<br>
<br>
A case in point might by my own reactive-banana library.<br>
<br>
 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Reactive-banana" target=3D=
"_blank">http://haskell.org/<u></u>haskellwiki/Reactive-banana</a><br>
<br>
I have extensive haddocks and many examples ranging from simple to complica=
ted<br>
<br>
 =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Reactive-banana/Examples" =
target=3D"_blank">http://haskell.org/<u></u>haskellwiki/Reactive-banana/<u>=
</u>Examples</a><br>
<br>
but so far, I never wrote a tutorial or introductory documentation. Curious=
ly, instead of sending complaints, people send me suggestions and code. I i=
nterpret this as a sign that my library is easy to understand (if you know =
Applicative Functors, that is) even though a key part of the documentation =
is still missing.<div class=3D"im">

<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Heinrich Apfelmus<br>
<br>
--<br>
<a href=3D"http://apfelmus.nfshost.com" target=3D"_blank">http://apfelmus.n=
fshost.com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br></div><div><div><=
/div><div class=3D"h5">
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org" target=3D"_blank">Haskell-Cafe@=
haskell.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target=3D"=
_blank">http://www.haskell.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><a href=3D"=
http://nickknowlson.com" target=3D"_blank">http://nickknowlson.com</a><br><=
br>

--90e6ba53a5d6f9b8bf04acff03f2--