No subject

Engineers" CRC Press, 2011.

So if one avoids such C++ complexity management features and a Haskell
compiler can see through most of the complexity management features of
Haskell; they should be comparable. :)


Casey

--=20
--
Regards,
KC

--20cf300fae7d64efa904c0ae8515
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>all the abstractions and obfuscations an =93advanced=94 C++ program co=
ntains.</div><div>First and foremost, C++ should be seen as a language that=
 enables complexity</div><div>management. The features one has grown fond o=
f in this concept, like operator</div>
<div>overloading, object orientation, automatic construction/destruction, e=
tc., are however</div><div>mostly unsuitable for efficient low-level code.&=
quot;</div><div><br></div><div>From &quot;Introduction to High Performance =
Computing for Scientists and Engineers&quot; CRC Press, 2011.</div>
<div><br></div><div>So if one avoids such C++ complexity management feature=
s and a Haskell compiler can see through most of the complexity management =
features of Haskell; they should be comparable. :)</div><div><br></div>
<div><br></div><div>Casey</div><div><br></div>-- <br>--<br>Regards,<br>KC<b=
r>

--20cf300fae7d64efa904c0ae8515--