[Haskell-cafe] Proposal: remove "Stability" from haddock documentation on hackage
Tom Murphy
amindfv at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 17:08:06 CEST 2011
On 6/7/11, James Cook <mokus at deepbondi.net> wrote:
[...]
>
> The name of the field could be better, though. On first exposure,
> people tend to think "stability: experimental" or "stability:
> unstable" means the package is likely to crash (For those who don't
> know, it means the API is likely to change in future releases).
>
What is the way to indicate actual code stability? Some packages on
Hackage definitely have "broken parts."
Tom
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list