[Haskell-cafe] Proposal: remove "Stability" from haddock documentation on hackage
amindfv at gmail.com
Wed Jun 8 17:08:06 CEST 2011
On 6/7/11, James Cook <mokus at deepbondi.net> wrote:
> The name of the field could be better, though. On first exposure,
> people tend to think "stability: experimental" or "stability:
> unstable" means the package is likely to crash (For those who don't
> know, it means the API is likely to change in future releases).
What is the way to indicate actual code stability? Some packages on
Hackage definitely have "broken parts."
More information about the Haskell-Cafe