[Haskell-cafe] Why not Darcs?

Felipe Almeida Lessa felipe.lessa at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 00:37:24 CEST 2011


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:16 PM, John Millikin <jmillikin at gmail.com> wrote:
> My chief complaint is that it's built on "patch theory", which is
> ill-defined and doesn't seem particularly useful. The Bazaar/Git/Mercurial
> DAG model is much easier to understand and work with.

For me its greatest asset is the patch theory.  I find it much easier
to understand than git's model.  I don't know about hg/bzr, but I
guess they have a model similar to git's.  So I guess this point is up
to debate.  =)

Cheers,

-- 
Felipe.



More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list