[Haskell-cafe] Why not Darcs?
Felipe Almeida Lessa
felipe.lessa at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 00:37:24 CEST 2011
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:16 PM, John Millikin <jmillikin at gmail.com> wrote:
> My chief complaint is that it's built on "patch theory", which is
> ill-defined and doesn't seem particularly useful. The Bazaar/Git/Mercurial
> DAG model is much easier to understand and work with.
For me its greatest asset is the patch theory. I find it much easier
to understand than git's model. I don't know about hg/bzr, but I
guess they have a model similar to git's. So I guess this point is up
to debate. =)
Cheers,
--
Felipe.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list