[Haskell-cafe] Re: Do expression definition

Gleb Alexeyev gleb.alexeev at gmail.com
Mon Sep 13 06:06:21 EDT 2010

On 09/13/2010 12:45 PM, Gleb Alexeyev wrote:

> is, pardon my pun, not ok, because f is let-bound and, therefore,
> monomorphic

This line doesn't make sense, I was too hasty to hit the 'Send' button, 
I meant to write 'lambda-bound', of course, apologies for that.

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list