[Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell web development entries on the Wiki
michael at snoyman.com
Sun Oct 3 06:31:31 EDT 2010
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Christopher Done
<chrisdone at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 3 October 2010 12:10, Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com> wrote:
>> I would actually do the opposite: we can put the libraries/frameworks
>> that we are sure *are* active into the Active section and put
>> everything else into Inactive. I have a feeling we'll be pretty close
>> on the mark with our guesses; a quick look at the last upload date on
>> Hackage should be sufficient. People are *much* more likely to move
>> stuff from Inactive to Active than the other way around.
>> We can also send out an email to the cafe/web-devel with a list of
>> packages we plan to mark as inactive and see if anyone objects. If no
>> one is willing to stand up for a package, odds are it's dead.
> That sounds like a good approach. Anyway, it's not the end of the
> world if a package gets put in inactive. Ones I know are definitely
> active are:
> Haskell on a Horse
> Turbinado -- is this still active? Alson Kemp basically ditched Haskell, so...
> The others... I don't know.
I think it's fair to say that turbinado is inactive. But keep in mind
that we should probably look at more than just the frameworks:
servers, templating, etc.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe