[Haskell-cafe] Re: Is "let" special?

[Maciej Piechotka]

On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 18:05 +0100, Petr Pudlak wrote:
>      Hi Günther,
> 
> from the semantical point of view, you can replace
> > let x = e' in e
> by
> > (\x -> e) e'
> Both should evaluate to the same thing. 

You also need (sometimes) fix function

> let xs = 1:xs in xs 

and

> fix (\xs -> 1:xs)

Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20101103/6e4b4ed6/attachment.bin