[Haskell-cafe] Is "let" special?
C. McCann
cam at uptoisomorphism.net
Wed Nov 3 16:11:47 EDT 2010
2010/11/3 Petr Pudlak <deb at pudlak.name>:
>> f = (\x -> x x) (\y -> y)
>> g = let x = \y -> y in x x
>
> The function "f" is not typable in the Hindley-Milner type system, while "g"
> is is (and its type is "a -> a"). The reason is that in the first case (f),
> the typing system tries to assign a single type to "x", which is impossible
And just to be clear, this is specific to the H-M system. The function
"f" is typeable--but not inferable--in GHC-Haskell-with-extensions,
i.e. the definition:
> {-# LANGUAGE Rank2Types #-}
>
> f = ((\x -> x x) :: forall a. (forall b. b -> b) -> a -> a) (\y -> y)
...is valid and will have the correct type for "f". The more
restricted system provided by H-M is interesting largely because
everything typeable in it is also inferable.
- C.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list