[Haskell-cafe] Would it be evil to add "deriving Typeable" to newtype Q?

Ivan Miljenovic ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com
Wed May 5 20:16:29 EDT 2010

Previous message: [Haskell-cafe] Would it be evil to add "deriving Typeable" to newtype Q?
Next message: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: Holumbus-Distribution 0.1.0 - distributed data structures
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6 May 2010 02:17, Leonel Fonseca <leonelfl at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is it reasonable to add "deriving Typeable" to newtype Q?

With GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving you mean?  If so, then I don't see why
it would be a problem.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com

Previous message: [Haskell-cafe] Would it be evil to add "deriving Typeable" to newtype Q?
Next message: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: Holumbus-Distribution 0.1.0 - distributed data structures
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list