Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Are there any gay haskelleres?

[Alberto G. Corona]

Also some operators are clearly sexist >>=, ->  => etc etc. I don´t kmow if
the lack of female haskellers is due to this inpudic exhibition of male
domination ;)

2010/3/28 Ertugrul Soeylemez <es at ertes.de>

Fraser Wilson <blancolioni at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm sure there's some theory about fags being unable to use tools and
> > stuff.
> >  It certainly cannot be anything to do with cultural pressure.
> > Perhaps it is easy to mistake a male-dominated field for one that
> > males are intrinsically good at, but really, have a look at the Y
> > chromosome, it does nobody any favours.  Gender is hormonal.
>
> I'd rather look at the Y combinator, which kind of resembles a penis:
>
>  Y = \
>  f
>  -> (\x -> f (x x)) (\x ->
>  f
>  (x x))
>
>
> Greets,
> Ertugrul
>
>
> --
> nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex)
> http://blog.ertes.de/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100328/6b2e7f27/attachment.html